Christine Levan

Christine Kay Levan, age 56, New Lebanon, OH View Details

Cities: Midway City CA, Glenview IL, Morton Grove IL Possible Relatives: Hoa John Levan, Johnchristian N Levan, Kristine A Levan

Christine E Levan, age 53, Lakeland, FL View Details

Cities: Midway City CA, Glenview IL, Morton Grove IL Possible Relatives: Hoa John Levan, Johnchristian N Levan, Kristine A Levan

Christine Cherise Levan, age 56, Porterville, CA View Details

Cities: Midway City CA, Glenview IL, Morton Grove IL Possible Relatives: Hoa John Levan, Johnchristian N Levan, Kristine A Levan

Christine H Levan, age 89, Berwick, PA View Details

Cities: Midway City CA, Glenview IL, Morton Grove IL Possible Relatives: Hoa John Levan, Johnchristian N Levan, Kristine A Levan

Christine Marie Levan, age 60, Robesonia, PA View Details

Cities: Midway City CA, Glenview IL, Morton Grove IL Possible Relatives: Hoa John Levan, Johnchristian N Levan, Kristine A Levan

Christine L Levan, age 36, Hamburg, PA View Details

Cities: Midway City CA, Glenview IL, Morton Grove IL Possible Relatives: Hoa John Levan, Johnchristian N Levan, Kristine A Levan

Christine A Levan, age 54 View Details

Address:***** 1st St, Summersville, MO. Phone Number: (417) 932-****

Christine A Levan, age 71 View Details

Address:***** 122nd Way, Seminole, FL. Phone Number: (727) 323-****

Christine A Levan, age 52 View Details

Address:***** W Valley Dr, Lehighton, PA. Phone Number: (610) 703-****

Christine M Levan, age 53 View Details

Address:***** W Broadway, Columbia, MO. Phone Number: (618) 339-****

Christine J Levan, age 62 View Details

Address:***** Lakeview Cir, Morganton, GA. Phone Number: (706) 374-****

Christine A Levan, age 39 View Details

Address:***** 3rd St, Bloomsburg, PA. Phone Number: (570) 389-****

Christine A Levan, age 49 View Details

Address:***** Homestead Dr, Lebanon, PA. Phone Number: (717) 507-****

Christine A Levan, age 40s, Troy, NY View Details

Locations: Troy NY, Johnsonville NY Possible Relatives: James Franklin, Mary E Franklin, Paul T Franklin

Christine T tran Levan, age 40s, Gilroy, CA View Details

Locations: Gilroy CA, Oklahoma City OK Possible Relatives: Thaito Tina Do, Harry T Levan, Robert Tuyen Levan

Christine K Levan, age 40s, New Lebanon, OH View Details

Locations: New Lebanon OH, Dayton OH, Union OH Possible Relatives: Carol J Hale, Brent N Levan, Carol J Levan

Christine Adele Levan, age 50s, Greenwood, IN View Details

Locations: Greenwood IN, Beech Grove IN, Munster IN Possible Relatives: Cayla Dehart, Chester A Dehart, Darlene W Dehart

Christine R Levan, age 50s, Winter Haven, FL View Details

Locations: Winter Haven FL Possible Relatives: Howard Ray Adams, Moses W Adams, Virginia M Adams

Christine A Levan, age 60s, Hopewell, NJ View Details

Locations: Hopewell NJ, Saint Petersburg FL, Flemington NJ Possible Relatives: Arthur G Levan, Adam M Mikucki, Anthony B Mikucki

Christine Ann Levan, age 60s, Rice Lake, WI View Details

Locations: Rice Lake WI, Rice Lk WI Possible Relatives: Amanda Lynn Le Van, Dorothy M Levan, Dorothy A Levan

Christine Mrs Levan, age 96, Wilkes Barre, PA View Details

Cities: Wilkes Barre PA, Berwick PA Possible Relatives: Frank R Levan, Jennifer Louise Levan, Terry D Levan

Christine A Levan, age 104, Troy, NY View Details

Cities: Troy NY, Johnsonville NY

Evangelou v McNicol

Christine Evangelou and others v Iain McNicol [2016] EWCA Civ 817 is an English contract law case brought by five members of the Labour Party of the United Kingdom against its General Secretary, Iainread more... McNicol on behalf of the whole party, concerning the eligibility of members to vote in the party's leadership election of 2016. The claimants came to court to challenge the decision of the party's National Executive Committee to bar members from voting in the election if they joined the party after 12 January 2016. This was due to affect approximately 130,000 new members. The judge at first instance sided with the claimants, although this decision was overturned on appeal. On 14 August, it was announced that the claimants would not be challenging this decision in the Supreme Court.read less...